Breakingviews - Merz’s Victory Opens New Era of German Uncertainty
Friedrich Merz will be the next chancellor of Germany, but his conservative alliance received only 29% of the vote, leaving him with little chance to form a government without the social democrats. The European Union's powerhouse will remain without a proper government in a heated geopolitical context, just as its economy is entering its third year of crisis. Merz has long pushed for continued support for Ukraine and increased defense budgets, but his plans may be complicated by the rise of insurgent parties.
This victory signals a new era of German politics, where traditional center-ground parties are being challenged by the emergence of right-wing populist forces and ideological purists.
How will Merkel's successor navigate the complex web of alliances and rivalries between old guard social democrats, left-wing insurgents, and far-right populists to achieve any semblance of stability in the coming years?
Friedrich Merz's conservatives and the Social Democrats (SPD) have successfully concluded preliminary coalition talks, emphasizing a commitment to stricter measures on illegal migration and economic growth. Merz aims for Germany to achieve 1-2% growth after two years of contraction while increasing military spending and state borrowing to revive the economy. The next phase involves negotiations with the Green party, which will be crucial for passing proposed fiscal measures.
This coalition represents a significant shift in German politics, reflecting broader trends in Europe where migration and security have become central issues for mainstream parties in response to the rise of far-right movements.
Will the coalition's proposed changes to immigration and economic policy resonate with the electorate, or will they face backlash from constituents who prioritize different issues?
Friedrich Merz, Germany's chancellor-in-waiting and leader of the Christian Democratic Union party CDU, is racing against time to win over crucial Greens' party support for a massive 500 billion euro infrastructure fund and borrowing rule overhaul. The proposed reforms could jolt markets and spark debate about whether they will revive Europe's largest economy. Germany's conservatives and the SPD are working together on the proposals, which aim to address concerns about economic growth and competitiveness.
This move marks an unusual shift for conservative German politics, as it relies heavily on coalition-building efforts and seeks support from a key environmental party like the Greens.
Will the proposed reforms succeed in revitalizing Germany's economy and setting a precedent for other European countries to follow?
Germany's conservatives are facing defeat in Sunday's Hamburg regional vote, just one week after leader Friedrich Merz's victory over Chancellor Olaf Scholz's Social Democrats in the national election. The current SPD mayor, Peter Tschentscher, is expected to win with 33% of the vote and will likely continue governing in a coalition with the Greens as junior partners. The Hamburg regional election marks a significant shift for the conservative party, which has ruled the northern port city for most of the past 80 years.
This outcome could signal a broader decline in support for Merkel's legacy politics among German voters, potentially setting a precedent for future electoral challenges to center-right parties.
How will the implications of this regional defeat affect Merz's chances of becoming the next Chancellor of Germany?
Germany's Greens are signaling potential refusal to support Friedrich Merz's plans for a significant increase in state borrowing, with concerns rising over the approval process as negotiations progress. The proposed reforms include a special 500 billion euro infrastructure fund aimed at revitalizing the economy, but the Greens demand more climate protection measures to be integrated into the plans. As the political landscape shifts with an incoming parliament, the dynamics between Merz, the Greens, and other coalition partners could complicate the path to passing these crucial measures.
This situation illustrates the intricate balance required in coalition politics, where competing priorities and demands can either forge a path to progress or lead to legislative gridlock.
What implications might the Greens' stance have on future coalitions and the approach to economic policy in Germany?
Friedrich Merz's conservatives and the Social Democrats (SPD) have concluded preliminary discussions aimed at forming a coalition government, outlining a comprehensive 11-page position paper on key policy areas. The proposed measures include stricter border controls, a reformed welfare system, energy price reductions, and targeted economic growth strategies, alongside support for industries deemed strategic. The coalition's success hinges on legislative approval of significant financial measures, including a 500-billion-euro infrastructure fund, which faces opposition from various political factions.
This coalition signifies a pivotal shift in German politics, as the new government's focus on integration, economic recovery, and strategic industries reflects broader trends in European governance amid global challenges.
How will the coalition navigate the competing interests of its diverse constituents while trying to implement these ambitious reforms?
Germany's likely next chancellor, Friedrich Merz, is considering setting up special funds worth nearly a trillion euros to finance urgent defence and infrastructure spending, prompting double-digit percentage rises in shares in defence contractors. The proposed funds would amount to 20% of German GDP, with economists proposing sums of 400 billion euros and 500 billion euros respectively. This fiscal sea change would be unprecedented since the Cold War, sending Europe's defence stocks soaring.
The proposed defence fund highlights Germany's recognition of its need for a significant military overhaul, one that has been long overdue given its history of being a defence laggard.
What implications will this sudden surge in defence spending have on Germany's relationship with NATO and its role in global security initiatives?
Beate Meinl-Reisinger, leader of Austria's small, liberal Neos party, called on party members to make history on Sunday and support what she sees as a move supporting liberal democracy as they voted on whether to join a proposed coalition government. Three centrist parties announced coalition deal last week; Neos members must approve the deal to join next government if they do not, two-party coalition has one-seat majority. Government to be sworn in on Monday after historic wait.
The historic nature of this vote underscores the importance of centrism in maintaining a balanced government, where no single party holds absolute power.
As Austria's future government takes shape, how will its policies impact the country's relations with neighboring countries and the European Union?
Merz seeks talks with France and UK on sharing nuclear weapons, but not as a substitute for US protection. Germany is bound to non-nuclear defence due to its Second World War past, but participates in NATO weapons-sharing arrangements. Merz plans coalition by Easter, crucially needing Green Party support to pass key financial measures.
The proposal for shared European nuclear weapons could be seen as a pragmatic response to Russia's increasing military presence in Europe, where deterrence is a top priority.
How would the deployment of such nuclear assets affect the delicate balance between collective security and individual national sovereignty within the EU?
The yield on Germany's 10-year bonds surged 30 basis points, their worst day since the fall of the Berlin Wall, as Chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz unveiled a sweeping fiscal overhaul that will unlock hundreds of billions of euros for defense and infrastructure investments. The plan has prompted hopes that it will boost the European economy and put the euro on track for its best three-day run since 2015. However, investors have long argued that Germany's tight fiscal constraints are hampering national growth.
The massive injection of government spending could be seen as a deliberate attempt to recalibrate Europe's economic strategy away from austerity and towards a more expansionary approach, similar to Japan’s post-bubble recovery.
Will the German debt crisis serve as a catalyst for a broader reassessment of European fiscal policy and its implications for the global economy?
Austria's first three-party government since the aftermath of World War Two took office on Monday, ending the country's longest-ever wait for a ruling coalition and keeping the Russia-friendly, far-right Freedom Party (FPO) out of power. The centrist alternative formed by the conservative People's Party (OVP), Social Democrats (SPO), and liberal Neos has overcome their earlier failure to do a deal, vowing to cooperate and get things done. Despite concerns about its fragility, the new government is focused on shrinking Austria's budget deficit and implementing stricter immigration rules.
The formation of this three-party government marks a significant shift in Austrian politics, where the far right was previously seen as an outsider party, but now finds itself at the center of power.
As the FPO's influence wanes, what implications will this have for Austria's relationships with neighboring countries and its stance on European integration?
German lawmakers are set to debate a 500-billion-euro infrastructure fund and significant changes to state borrowing rules aimed at boosting defense spending and economic growth, with votes scheduled before the formation of a new parliament. The proposed reforms reflect a dramatic shift from Germany's traditional fiscal conservatism, driven by increasing geopolitical tensions and a perceived need for improved national security. However, these measures face potential roadblocks from far-right and radical-left factions that may gain more influence in the newly elected parliament.
The urgency surrounding these debates underscores the shifting political landscape in Europe, as nations reconsider their defense strategies amid rising global uncertainties.
What long-term implications could this borrowing strategy have on Germany's economic stability and its role within the European Union?
Talks between Germany's conservatives and Social Democrats (SPD) focused on forming a coalition amid plans to increase military spending in Europe. A nearly trillion euro borrowing boom is seen as a way to fund infrastructure and defense spending. The proposal includes 400 billion euros for the German military and 500 billion euros for infrastructure.
This potential surge in government spending could have far-reaching consequences for Germany's economy, including inflationary pressures and strain on public finances.
How will the impact of increased military spending on global geopolitics be assessed by international partners, particularly given the current tensions between Russia and Ukraine?
Germany's coalition agreed a landmark deal to exempt defense spending from its harsh debt brakes, in addition to unveiling a $535 billion infrastructure pledge. The country announced plans to change its constitution and abandon its long-standing commitment to fiscal prudence. Germany finally unveiled a plan that could address years of economic decline and the war in Ukraine as the country announced plans to change its constitution and abandon its long-standing commitment to fiscal prudence.
This historic shift in policy could mark a turning point for Germany's economy, potentially reigniting growth and competitiveness by unleashing pent-up spending on vital infrastructure projects.
What implications might this new direction have for Europe's collective security and defense posture, as a major power like Germany seeks to reassert its influence amidst rising tensions with Russia?
Germany's outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy discussed the potential role of U.S. President Donald Trump in facilitating peace negotiations for Ukraine amid its ongoing conflict with Russia. Both leaders emphasized the necessity of U.S. leadership to establish a ceasefire and long-lasting stability in the region, highlighting the urgency for a comprehensive resolution rather than a temporary halt to hostilities. Scholz reaffirmed Germany's steadfast support for Ukraine during this critical period as Zelenskiy expressed readiness to collaborate under Trump's guidance for a secure future.
This dialogue illustrates the intricate dynamics of international diplomacy, where the influence of U.S. leadership is pivotal in shaping conflict resolution strategies in Eastern Europe.
What implications might arise if Trump's leadership approach diverges significantly from current U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine?
Germany's conservative parties and the Social Democrats (SPD) have reached a consensus to pursue reforms to the country's debt brake, aiming to facilitate increased defense spending and the establishment of a substantial 500 billion euro infrastructure fund. This agreement highlights the urgency of addressing national challenges and reflects a strategic shift in fiscal policy to bolster economic resilience. The collaborative effort showcases a willingness to adapt to changing geopolitical demands while balancing fiscal responsibility.
This development signifies a potential turning point in Germany's economic policy, potentially reshaping the nation's approach to defense and infrastructure investment in response to global pressures.
What implications might this reform have on Germany's long-term economic stability and its role within the European Union?
Stocker took over his party during chaotic coalition talks, sworn in as chancellor despite no ministerial experience, and showed steady hand dealing with far right and centrists. The pragmatic and plain-speaking lawyer has sought to keep Austria firmly within the European Union and critical of Russia, unlike FPO leader Herbert Kickl. Stocker's low-key style is viewed as more competent than charismatic, and he is not expected to lead his party in the next election.
The appointment of Chancellor Christian Stocker presents an opportunity for Austrian politics to adapt to a new era of pragmatic leadership, one that may prioritize stability over flashy rhetoric.
How will Austria's fragile coalition government navigate the complex web of European and global politics under Stocker's steady hand?
Economists are considering billions of euros for special funds to boost Germany's defence and infrastructure spending, with a sense of urgency heightened by a heated meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and U.S. President Donald Trump. The proposed funds are expected to be substantial, with estimates ranging from 400 billion to 500 billion euros for the infrastructure fund alone. However, no final decisions have been made yet, and parties in talks to form Germany's new government coalition have declined to comment on the details.
The German government's ability to address pressing security concerns and modernize its military will depend largely on the outcome of these funding discussions, which could have significant implications for European defence policy.
How will the impact of Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine influence the design and allocation of these special funds in Germany?
European leaders are set to endorse significant increases in defence spending and express unwavering support for Ukraine at an upcoming summit, following concerns over U.S. military aid under Donald Trump's administration. The meeting will feature Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, although Hungary's potential veto could complicate the endorsement of a joint statement supporting Kyiv. This shift in European defence strategy is driven by heightened fears of Russian aggression and a desire for greater autonomy in security matters amid uncertainty about U.S. commitments.
The evolving landscape of European defence spending reflects a critical juncture where nations are compelled to reassess their reliance on U.S. support and to bolster their own military capabilities in the face of external threats.
What implications could a shift towards increased European military autonomy have on NATO's future cohesion and the balance of power in global security dynamics?
The German government's plan to invest hundreds of billions of euros in defense and infrastructure is boosting a popular trade in bond market, known as a curve steepener, where investors bet that securities maturing in the more distant future will underperform shorter-term notes. The gap between two- and 10-year German yields has widened to its most in two years, with investors expecting higher government spending to result in increased bond issuance, faster growth, and possible inflation. This trade is gaining momentum as investors anticipate that Germany's parliament will pass the spending plan, despite a challenge from the Green party.
As European governments increase spending on defense, it highlights the growing threat of cyber attacks and terrorism, which may be a catalyst for further government investment in cybersecurity measures.
What implications would a steeper European yield curve have for the global economy, particularly in terms of interest rates and inflation in countries with weaker economic fundamentals?
Goldman Sachs and Nomura have lifted their expectations for Germany's economic growth in 2025 due to increased military and infrastructure spending, which is expected to boost the country's economy and have spillover effects on its European neighbors. Goldman expects a 0.2% growth rate for Europe's largest economy, up from 0.8%, while Nomura predicts a pace of euro area economic growth could be lifted by 0.2 percentage points per quarter by the end of 2026. The fiscal news is also expected to lower pressure on the European Central Bank to reduce rates below neutral.
The significant boost in military and infrastructure spending in Germany may lead to a shift in the global economic landscape, with potential implications for trade flows, foreign investment, and economic growth in other countries.
Will this increase in government spending have a disproportionate impact on the already strained public finances of smaller European nations, and could it exacerbate existing fiscal imbalances?
The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has submitted urgent legal motions to the constitutional court, seeking to block a planned convening of the outgoing German parliament to consider a significant half-trillion-euro spending package. The proposed changes aim to expand defense and infrastructure spending, sparking concerns about potential constitutional implications. However, the far-right party is challenging this move due to concerns over its legitimacy.
This attempt by AfD highlights the increasing tensions between traditional parties and the growing influence of populist movements in shaping Germany's legislative agenda.
Can the German constitution be altered without a more inclusive and representative process that engages with a wider range of voices, including those from the far-right party?
Germany's recent decision to overhaul its fiscal policies marks a significant shift that could revitalize Europe's struggling economy, positioning the nation as a central economic force once again. The proposed spending plans, including a 500 billion euro infrastructure fund and increased defense expenditures, reflect a proactive response to geopolitical threats and a desire for greater economic autonomy. This transformation in fiscal strategy could have far-reaching implications not just for Germany, but for the entire European Union, as it attempts to recover from stagnation and reinvigorate growth.
This bold fiscal pivot suggests a potential paradigm shift in how European nations might approach economic challenges, prioritizing investment over austerity in a bid for resilience and growth.
What long-term impacts might this fiscal strategy have on the political landscape within the EU, especially regarding countries with differing economic philosophies?
Uruguay's new president, Yamandu Orsi, is set to take office on Saturday after a left-wing government returned to power, marking a shift away from the right-wing trend in Latin America. Orsi's Broad Front party has tapped into voter concerns about violent crime and inequality, promising "safe change" to contrast with more polarizing figures in the region. The new administration will inherit an economy expected to grow 2.5% this year, with unemployment below pre-Covid levels.
As Orsi navigates his economic team's ambitious plans, he must confront a tight fiscal deficit and high inflation, raising questions about the sustainability of his campaign promises.
How will Uruguay's foreign policy stance evolve under Orsi's leadership, particularly in the context of China-US tensions and global trade norms that were significantly altered by President Trump's tariffs?
Musk's promotion of Germany's far-right party, Alternative fur Deutschland, had little impact on election results, despite his efforts to amplify its figures through 2 dozen posts on X and an interview with its leader. The AfD's stunning second-place result in the February 23 election suggests that Musk's support may have been more symbolic than substantive. Despite this, Tesla is already feeling the effects of Musk's politics, with European sales tumbling 45% in January from a year earlier.
The extent to which Musk's far-right activism has influenced his business decisions, such as prioritizing regulatory relief over customer needs, remains unclear and warrants closer examination.
Can Tesla recover its lost sales momentum by distancing itself from Musk's divisive rhetoric and refocusing on the products that drove its initial success?
Some on Europe's far-right are torn about Trump's dressing-down of Zelenskiy and his seeming indifference to the perceived threat Putin poses. Orban, Chrupalla, Salvini side with Trump's tilt towards RussiaOthers such as Meloni, Farage and Le Pen more guardedDivergence shows European far right far from cohesive group. The divisions within Europe's far-right movement over Trump's approach to ending Ukraine war are exposing deep fissures among the party members.
This divergence highlights how far-right populist movements are struggling to come together on a unified stance, especially when it comes to issues of foreign policy and national security.
How will these internal divisions affect the ability of far-right parties to present a cohesive front in European Union politics?