Canada Deports More People, Predominantly Those Rejected for Refugee Status
Canada deported more people last year than at any point since at least 2015, overwhelmingly deporting people whose refugee claims were rejected, data obtained by Reuters showed. About 79% of those deported last year through November 19 were failed refugee claimants, a significant increase from previous years. The government has budgeted more money for deportations this year, despite concerns from refugee lawyers that people can be deported while still appealing decisions about the risk they face if returned to their home countries.
This surge in deportations highlights the tension between Canada's commitment to protecting refugees and its need to address the backlog of immigration claims, raising questions about how these competing priorities will be balanced in the years ahead.
As Canada continues to deport more people, it remains to be seen whether the government's tough stance on migration will ultimately lead to a more secure border or further strain on an already overwhelmed asylum system.
Canada and the United States offered to resettle 48 ethnic Uyghurs held in detention in Thailand over the past decade, but Bangkok took no action for fear of upsetting China. The group was covertly deported to China despite calls from United Nations human rights experts, who warned they would be at risk of torture, ill-treatment, and "irreparable harm." Thailand's decision has drawn widespread condemnation from human rights groups.
The case highlights the complex dynamics between powerful nations and small countries like Thailand, where diplomatic pressure can sometimes lead to a country prioritizing its economic ties over human rights obligations.
What role do international organizations like the United Nations play in holding countries accountable for their actions on human rights issues, particularly when those organizations face resistance from powerful actors?
Gurpreet Singh's experience as an undocumented Indian immigrant is not unique. Thousands of people from around the world have attempted to cross into the US in search of a better life, only to be met with strict enforcement and deportation under President Trump's policies. The use of handcuffs and chains during deportations has sparked outrage globally, particularly among India's opposition parties. The Indian government had raised concerns with the US about these treatment methods, but ultimately allowed them to continue.
This alarming trend highlights the consequences of a zero-tolerance immigration policy that prioritizes enforcement over compassion and understanding.
How will the long-term effects of Trump's deportations shape global attitudes towards migration, asylum seekers, and the role of governments in protecting human rights?
Two years of economic growth may be wiped off permanently. Unemployment could rise to 8% from 6.6% in January, analysts say. At least 90% chance of Bank of Canada cutting rates next week.
The escalating trade tensions between the US and Canada will likely have far-reaching consequences for small businesses and entrepreneurs on both sides of the border, highlighting the need for more effective support systems to mitigate the impact of tariffs.
As the global economic landscape becomes increasingly unpredictable, how can governments and policymakers work together to create a more resilient and inclusive economy that prioritizes fairness, stability, and long-term growth?
Across the country, Canadians are defiant in boycotting American goods and travel even as Trump promises another temporary reprieve. This defiance stems from a deep sense of disrespect towards Canada's sovereignty, with many viewing Trump's characterization of Canada as the "51st state" as a thinly veiled attempt to undermine national identity. The backlash has been fierce, with some Canadians taking matters into their own hands by boycotting American products and expressing outrage on social media.
The fragility of trust in international relations is evident in this scenario, where a single individual's words can have far-reaching consequences for entire nations.
What are the implications for global diplomacy if leaders continue to use rhetoric that erodes the foundation of international cooperation?
Rwanda has expressed its strong opposition to Canada's measures aimed at curbing the export of goods and technologies to the country, calling them "shameful" in a statement released on Tuesday. The Canadian government had announced the suspension of permits for controlled exports, as well as the cancellation of bilateral aid and trade missions, in response to Rwanda's alleged support of the M23 rebel group in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. This move has further isolated Rwanda from major international players, exacerbating the already dire humanitarian situation in the region.
Canada's actions serve as a stark reminder that economic pressures can be an effective tool for exerting influence on countries with questionable human rights records.
Will these diplomatic efforts ultimately lead to a negotiated settlement or simply embolden extremist groups to continue their violence?
Canada is poised to engage in early talks with the United States on reviewing the North American free trade pact, with a focus on addressing trade friction and preventing "dumping" by China into the North American market. The country's finance minister, Dominic LeBlanc, expressed readiness to move quickly towards a broader negotiation that sorts out many points of contention between the three nations. Canada is also prepared to work with the White House to hash out further measures to prevent Chinese dumping, following the imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, steel, and aluminum last year.
The complex web of trade tensions and retaliatory measures in North America may ultimately lead to a more nuanced understanding of the true costs and benefits of protectionism, forcing policymakers to reevaluate their assumptions about the impact of tariffs.
Will the upcoming review of the USMCA serve as an opportunity for Canada to push back against what it perceives as unfair trade practices by its largest trading partner, or will it succumb to pressure to make concessions in exchange for continued access to the US market?
Mass incarceration of Indigenous people deepened under Trudeau; Sentencing rules, supervisory orders and parole denials drive higher incarceration rates; Standardized risk assessments can work against Indigenous people. The Canadian government's efforts to address the over-representation of Indigenous people in custody have failed, with Indigenous individuals now accounting for more than one-third of federal inmates. The use of standardized risk assessments has been criticized for disproportionately affecting Indigenous people due to systemic racism and higher rates of poverty and instability.
The Trudeau government's failure to address the mass incarceration crisis of Indigenous people raises questions about the effectiveness of its policies on reconciliation and nation-to-nation relations.
What role will Canada's justice system reform efforts play in addressing the root causes of Indigenous over-representation in custody, such as poverty, trauma, and systemic racism?
Ecuador's decision not to receive deported migrants of other nationalities marks a significant shift in the country's asylum policy, as President Daniel Noboa prioritizes the welfare of his own citizens. This move is seen as a response to growing concerns about the treatment of migrant workers in Ecuador, who have been subjected to abuse and exploitation by some employers. By refusing to accept deportees from other countries, Noboa aims to protect the rights of Ecuadorian citizens.
The implications of this policy shift could be far-reaching, with potential repercussions for the global migrant worker community and the labor movement as a whole.
How will Ecuador's stance on deported migrants affect its relations with neighboring countries and international organizations?
The Canadian economy grew 2.6 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2024, beating expectations and driven by higher spending on vehicles, increased exports, and business investments. This unexpected growth may provide some relief to businesses and investors, but economists caution that tariff uncertainty could still weigh heavily on the economy. The Bank of Canada's next interest rate decision will be closely watched, as policymakers consider whether the recent data is enough to justify further rate cuts.
The surprise boost in fourth-quarter growth highlights the vulnerability of economic forecasts to unexpected shocks, underscoring the need for policymakers to carefully balance their expectations with the complexities of real-world data.
How will the Bank of Canada navigate the tightrope between supporting a fragile economy and protecting against potential risks posed by escalating trade tensions?
Canada has unveiled a significant aid package worth over C$6.5 billion to support businesses and individuals affected by U.S. tariffs, providing financial assistance, loan options, and modified employment insurance rules. The relief measures aim to help companies tap into new international markets, absorb losses, and prevent layoffs, addressing the potential economic impact of the trade dispute. These moves demonstrate Canada's efforts to mitigate the effects of the tariffs on its economy.
This package highlights the vulnerability of Canadian exporters due to their heavy reliance on U.S. trade, underscoring the need for diversification strategies to reduce dependence on a single market.
How will the effectiveness of these relief measures be evaluated in terms of the long-term impact on Canada's economic growth and trade relationships with other countries?
Canada's economy is headed for a contraction — the first since the Covid-19 crisis — if a tariff war with its largest trading partner lasts for long. Economists have estimated that President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada will shave 2 to 4 percentage points off the country’s gross domestic product growth. The administration imposed levies of 10% on Canadian energy and 25% on all other goods, starting Tuesday.
As the global economy becomes increasingly interconnected, the ripple effects of a trade war can be far-reaching, highlighting the need for more nuanced international cooperation to mitigate the negative impacts on small businesses and workers.
Will the Canadian government be able to navigate this economic downturn without succumbing to the temptation of populist rhetoric or relying on outdated protectionist policies?
Justin Trudeau's Liberal Party has experienced a significant resurgence in polling, now exceeding 30% support, largely due to U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressive rhetoric about Canada potentially becoming the 51st state. This shift comes as the Conservative Party, previously favored for victory, has seen its messaging falter in light of rising Canadian patriotism and fears over Trump's tariffs and their economic implications. As the Liberal Party prepares for a leadership transition amidst this evolving political landscape, the impact of Trump's presidency on Canadian politics remains a critical focal point.
The situation illustrates how external political pressures can dramatically alter domestic political dynamics, forcing parties to adapt to new narratives that resonate with voters' heightened sense of national identity.
How will the evolving relationship between Canada and the U.S. shape the policies and strategies of Canadian political parties in the future?
Canada has implemented retaliatory tariffs on US goods in response to the 25% tariffs imposed by President Trump, citing an "existential threat" to its economy. The tariffs target approximately C$155 billion worth of American products, raising concerns over job losses and economic repercussions in both countries. Canadian leaders have condemned the US measures as reckless, warning that they could push both economies towards recession and increase prices for consumers.
This escalating trade conflict highlights the interdependence of the US and Canadian economies, emphasizing the potential for widespread disruptions if tensions continue to rise.
In what ways might this trade dispute reshape the future of North American economic relations and integration?
The Trump administration's decision to end temporary protections against deportation for thousands of Haitian and Venezuelan migrants living in the United States has been challenged in a federal court lawsuit, citing racial bias and discriminatory policies. The lawsuit argues that the administration lacked authority under the statute governing Temporary Protected Status (TPS) to reverse the extension granted by Democratic former President Joe Biden's administration last year. The decision will have far-reaching consequences for hundreds of thousands of migrants who could face deportation and loss of work permits.
The Trump administration's actions in this case highlight a broader trend of using discriminatory rhetoric and policies to target marginalized communities, which can have devastating consequences for individuals and families.
What role will the courts play in holding the federal government accountable for its treatment of migrant populations, particularly those fleeing violence and persecution in their home countries?
Canada will continue to engage with the Trump administration about tariffs imposed by the United States, despite Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's acknowledgment of a "trade war" between the two countries. The Canadian government has maintained its 25% tariffs on $30 billion of U.S. imports since January, and Trudeau indicated these measures would remain in place until the trade action is lifted. Trudeau's comments reflect ongoing tensions between the two nations over trade policies.
This escalation underscores the challenges of navigating complex trade relationships between large economic powers, where brinksmanship can often be a path to negotiating concessions.
What implications might this prolonged trade stalemate have for Canada's economy and its ability to diversify away from U.S. exports?
The Trump administration's plan to revoke the legal status of some 240,000 Ukrainians who fled to the U.S. during the war has sparked controversy and raised concerns about the treatment of asylum seekers. The White House's decision to pause intelligence sharing with Kyiv has also added to tensions between Washington and Moscow. Meanwhile, Mexico's judicial elections have been dominated by cartel influence, raising questions about the independence of the judiciary.
The intersection of politics and immigration policy highlights the complexities of refugee status and the challenges faced by asylum seekers in navigating bureaucratic systems.
Will the Trump administration's efforts to revoke Ukrainian asylum seekers' status be a precursor for broader changes in U.S. immigration policy, potentially affecting other vulnerable populations?
Rates for cross-border trucking to and from the U.S. jumped sharply in the lead up to President Donald Trump's new tariffs on Canada and Mexico, as companies scrambled to accelerate shipments ahead of an expected increase in costs. The brief surge marked a moment of respite for the struggling U.S. trucking industry, which has endured nearly three years of low rates due to weak demand and a surplus of trucks on the road. Once the new tariffs took effect, however, rates are likely to revert to normal as shippers gauge the impact of increased costs on their businesses.
The sudden spike in cross-border trucking rates highlights the complex web of supply chain dynamics at play when global trade policies shift, underscoring the need for greater investment in logistics infrastructure.
How will the ongoing volatility in trucking rates affect the competitiveness of U.S.-based companies that rely heavily on international shipments, particularly those in the manufacturing and e-commerce sectors?
Canada is imposing 25% tariffs on C$30 billion worth of U.S. imports effective immediately, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told reporters on Tuesday. The move is a response to the U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada. Trudeau assured that Canada will challenge the U.S. measures at the World Trade Organization and through the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.
This escalating trade dispute highlights the growing tensions between two major economic powers, with significant implications for global trade patterns and economic stability.
Will this trade war also affect other countries' interests in both the US and Canada, potentially leading to a broader conflict?
The Canadian dollar has reached its strongest level in 14 months against the US dollar, thanks to uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve's policy decisions under President Donald Trump. The decline of the US dollar has helped steer currency market direction, with other currencies benefiting from the shift. Investors are taking advantage of the weaker greenback to buy Canadian dollars, pushing up the value.
This surge in the Canadian dollar highlights the growing importance of exchange rates as a tool for investors seeking yield and diversification in uncertain economic environments.
Will this trend in currency markets signal a broader shift towards more flexible monetary policies from major central banks?
Canada is facing significant economic challenges as U.S. tariffs that took effect on Tuesday threaten to derail its fledgling recovery, fueling consumer price inflation and potentially triggering a recession. The country's reliance on trade with the United States makes it vulnerable to protracted trade wars, which could have far-reaching consequences for its economy. If the tariffs are sustained indefinitely, they could wipe out two years' worth of economic growth.
The current economic uncertainty is testing Canada's ability to diversify its export markets and reduce its dependence on trade with the United States, a challenge that could take time to resolve.
What steps will Canada take to address the potential impact of tariffs on its small businesses and workers who are already feeling the strain of inflation?
Canada's big bank CEOs are urging the federal government to remove internal trade barriers, evaluate tax policies, and other regulation as the country's top lenders cautioned that tariff and trade risks are clouding the economic outlook. The six big Canadian banks, which control more than 90% of the banking market and are among the biggest publicly listed companies in Canada, beat analysts' expectations for first-quarter profits but set aside large sums to shield against bad loans in an uncertain economy. The banks' CEOs delivered similar remarks on earnings calls this week.
As trade tensions between the US and Canada escalate, it is becoming increasingly clear that economic policy in North America has become highly politicized, threatening the stability of regional supply chains and investment decisions.
What long-term implications will a shift towards more protectionist trade policies have for the global banking industry, which relies heavily on cross-border transactions and investment?
Canada’s Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly has expressed serious concern regarding U.S. President Donald Trump's comments about making Canada the 51st state, emphasizing that the situation is far from humorous. Following the imposition of 25% tariffs on Canadian products, Joly articulated the strong sentiments of Canadians who feel insulted and angry, highlighting the broader implications of such trade tensions. As both nations navigate escalating tariffs, Joly advocates for collaboration with the UK and Europe, framing the tariffs as an "existential threat" to Canada's economy.
Joly's remarks reflect a growing frustration among Canadian leaders over the unpredictable nature of U.S. trade policies and the potential ripple effects on international relations.
How might Canada's response to U.S. tariffs reshape its approach to trade agreements with other nations in the future?
Canada has requested consultations with the United States at the World Trade Organization over "unjustified tariffs" imposed on Canadian imports, citing a need to protect its interests. The move comes as tensions between the two nations escalate, with Canada announcing retaliatory tariffs of C$30 billion and potentially another C$125 billion in 21 days if necessary. The dispute raises concerns about the impact on global trade and the potential for a new trade war between the world's largest economies.
The escalating tit-for-tat approach to trade disputes may lead to a destabilization of international trade relationships, where even seemingly minor irritants can escalate into full-blown conflicts.
What are the implications for the global economy if this trend towards protectionism and retaliatory measures continues, potentially limiting access to critical goods and services?
The Canadian government has taken swift action against the US after President Trump's executive order, imposing a sweeping package of counter-tariffs on $107 billion worth of US products. The move is expected to disrupt one of the world's largest bilateral trade relationships, worth over $900 billion in annual goods and services, and will have significant implications for businesses and consumers across both countries. Trudeau has vowed to protect Canadian industries and workers from what he sees as an unjustified decision by Trump.
This retaliatory measure highlights the escalating tensions between two of the world's largest economies, raising concerns about the stability of global trade relationships and the potential for future conflicts.
What will be the long-term impact on the US economy, particularly in industries that are heavily reliant on exports to Canada?