Canada Wants New Oil Pipelines to Avoid Trump Tariffs; Nobody Wants to Build Them
The Canadian government is urging the construction of new oil pipelines to avoid U.S. tariffs on its exports, but industry experts say regulatory, financial and political hurdles are too significant for private companies to overcome. The current Trans Mountain pipeline system has already experienced cost overruns and environmental opposition, making it challenging for potential investors to consider a new project. Canada's energy sector faces lengthy permitting times and regulatory uncertainty, which is deterring companies from pursuing pipeline proposals.
The lack of confidence in the Canadian government's ability to streamline the permitting process for oil pipelines could lead to a prolonged period of gridlock, further entrenching the nation's dependence on foreign suppliers.
What role should governments play in providing economic incentives or guarantees to mitigate the risks associated with investing in high-profile infrastructure projects like pipelines?
Canada's oilfield drilling and services sector is already showing signs of slowing due to U.S. President Donald Trump's threatened tariffs, triggering fears that an expected industry rebound could stall if such levies go forward. The Canadian drilling sector collapsed between 2014 and 2020 due to sustained low oil prices and reduced production during the COVID-19 pandemic. Activity has improved since 2020, but Trump's threat to impose a 10% tariff on the 4 million barrels per day (bpd) of Canadian crude imported into the U.S. could upend that, industry representatives said.
The vulnerability of oilfield service companies to market volatility highlights the need for more robust supply chain management and diversification strategies in this sector.
What long-term implications will a sustained tariff threat have on the global oil market, particularly if Canada responds with its own retaliatory measures?
The flow of Canadian oil into the United States slowed on three major pipelines within hours of the imposition of U.S. tariffs on crude imports from Canada, according to real-time data monitoring by Wood Mackenzie. The pipeline utilization fell significantly after the tariffs took effect, with Keystone's pipeline experiencing a drop of over 30% and Enbridge's Express utilization falling to approximately 19%. This sudden decrease in pipeline flows indicates that the recently implemented policy may have already had an impact on Canada-to-U.S. deliveries.
The immediate reduction in pipeline flows could indicate a shift in the supply chain dynamics between Canadian oil producers and U.S. refineries, potentially prompting changes in trade patterns.
How will the long-term effects of these tariffs on the global oil market and the competitiveness of Canadian oil producers be felt, particularly in the face of increasing demand for alternative energy sources?
Canada could potentially use oil and gas exports as a strategic bargaining chip in negotiations with the United States if U.S. tariffs on Canadian imports escalate, Foreign Minister Melanie Joly suggested, while leaving open the possibility of imposing export tariffs on key commodities to counter U.S. measures. The country is vowing to impose tariffs on C$155 billion worth of U.S. imports but has not yet indicated its willingness to reduce exports or impose tariffs on them. Canada's decision-making process is complex and influenced by various domestic interests, including Alberta's resistance to reducing energy exports.
The use of oil and gas exports as a bargaining chip highlights the interdependence between energy-rich countries and the need for effective communication in times of trade tensions.
Will the Canadian government's willingness to impose export tariffs on potash be a precursor to more aggressive measures against U.S. agricultural exports, potentially escalating the trade war?
Canadian oil faces 10% tariff, less than for other imports; Canadian crude discount widens. The Republican president said on Monday that all imports of Canadian and Mexican goods would be subject to a 25% tariff, except Canadian energy, which will only be charged a 10% duty. This move reflects the two countries' energy interdependence, with Canada providing half of U.S. crude imports.
The Trump administration's realpolitik on trade may signal a shift towards pragmatic decision-making in foreign policy, but it also raises questions about the long-term implications of such actions for U.S.-Canada relations.
How will the ongoing uncertainty surrounding Canadian oil exports impact the broader energy market, particularly in the event of sustained tariffs that could disrupt global supply chains?
Oil posted its largest monthly loss since September as escalating tariff threats from President Trump reduced investors' risk appetite, strengthened the dollar, and clouded the outlook for energy demand. The US relies heavily on oil imports from Canada and Mexico to feed its refineries, which could raise oil costs if tariffs are imposed. Meanwhile, higher charges on all other goods pose risks to economic growth and consumer confidence.
This month's decline highlights the volatile nature of global trade tensions and their impact on commodity prices, as investors' risk appetite is increasingly tied to the trajectory of US trade policy.
Can the rapidly evolving landscape of oil market dynamics, with its interplay between supply and demand, be adequately managed by policymakers and market participants to mitigate the risks associated with rising tariffs?
Canada's economy is headed for a contraction — the first since the Covid-19 crisis — if a tariff war with its largest trading partner lasts for long. Economists have estimated that President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada will shave 2 to 4 percentage points off the country’s gross domestic product growth. The administration imposed levies of 10% on Canadian energy and 25% on all other goods, starting Tuesday.
As the global economy becomes increasingly interconnected, the ripple effects of a trade war can be far-reaching, highlighting the need for more nuanced international cooperation to mitigate the negative impacts on small businesses and workers.
Will the Canadian government be able to navigate this economic downturn without succumbing to the temptation of populist rhetoric or relying on outdated protectionist policies?
Canada is facing significant economic challenges as U.S. tariffs that took effect on Tuesday threaten to derail its fledgling recovery, fueling consumer price inflation and potentially triggering a recession. The country's reliance on trade with the United States makes it vulnerable to protracted trade wars, which could have far-reaching consequences for its economy. If the tariffs are sustained indefinitely, they could wipe out two years' worth of economic growth.
The current economic uncertainty is testing Canada's ability to diversify its export markets and reduce its dependence on trade with the United States, a challenge that could take time to resolve.
What steps will Canada take to address the potential impact of tariffs on its small businesses and workers who are already feeling the strain of inflation?
Mexican state oil company Pemex is actively engaging with potential buyers in Asia and Europe as it seeks to redirect its crude oil exports following the imposition of 25% tariffs by the U.S. government. Historically reliant on U.S. markets, Pemex's exports have faced a significant slump, with a 44% year-on-year decline in January, prompting a strategic pivot toward non-U.S. markets like China and India. Despite the higher shipping costs and challenges posed by the aging domestic refining infrastructure, there is optimism about the appetite for Mexican crude in these new markets.
This shift underscores the broader implications of global trade dynamics, highlighting how geopolitical tensions can reshape energy markets and force companies to adapt their strategies.
What long-term changes might we expect in global oil trade patterns if more countries begin to impose tariffs similar to those seen between the U.S. and Mexico?
U.S. President Donald Trump announced that Japan, South Korea, and other countries are interested in investing "trillions of dollars" in a large natural gas pipeline project in Alaska, which he claims would be one of the largest globally. Discussions have begun among South Korean officials and U.S. representatives to explore the feasibility of the liquefied natural gas project, with a focus on mutual economic interests and potential tariff negotiations. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has indicated that increasing U.S. energy imports could benefit both nations by stabilizing Japan's energy supply and addressing the U.S. trade deficit.
This initiative highlights a growing international collaboration in energy infrastructure, which could reshape geopolitical dynamics and trade relations in the Asia-Pacific region.
What implications might this partnership have for energy security and economic cooperation among nations in a rapidly changing global landscape?
Oil prices were steady at the start of the week as traders weighed the outlook for Russia’s war in Ukraine ahead of President Donald Trump’s tariffs on US trading partners, which will likely lead to retaliatory measures. The market is bracing for a potential surge in costs for refiners, particularly if levies are imposed on Canadian and Mexican oil imports. However, the impact of these tariffs is still unclear, as traders await signs of spending plans by China.
The ongoing uncertainty surrounding Ukraine could continue to weigh on global energy markets, making it challenging for producers to predict pricing trends.
How will the global response to Trump's trade policies impact the trajectory of the oil market in the coming months?
The Trump administration's 10% energy tariff on Canadian electricity imports may exacerbate already strained U.S. power prices, particularly in the Northeast where reliance on Canadian supplies is higher. The U.S. grid operators are uncertain about the application of these tariffs to power, which could lead to significant reliability and wholesale market impacts. The potential for retaliatory measures from Canada could further disrupt a supply-and-demand balancing act that has kept blackouts at bay.
The escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada threaten to upend a delicate balance in the global energy market, where predictability is essential for maintaining grid stability.
How will the U.S. government's assertion of control over its own energy markets impact the long-term viability of cooperative relationships with neighboring countries like Canada?
Oil prices have experienced a decline for the fourth consecutive session, influenced by a larger-than-expected build in U.S. crude stockpiles and concerns over OPEC+'s decision to increase output. Brent crude settled at $69.30 per barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate dropped to $66.31, both touching multi-year lows earlier in the session. The combined impact of rising inventories and U.S. tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico has heightened fears of a slowdown in energy demand.
The interplay of geopolitical tensions and supply chain dynamics underscores the vulnerability of oil prices to external economic factors, potentially reshaping market strategies for both producers and consumers.
In light of these developments, how might global energy policies adapt to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuating oil prices and trade disputes?
Mexican state oil company Pemex is actively pursuing new buyers in Asia and Europe in response to the 25% tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump on Mexican crude oil imports. With exports to the U.S. plummeting to the lowest levels in decades, Pemex is exploring alternative markets, particularly in China, India, and South Korea, where there is a growing appetite for heavy crude. Despite potential challenges such as higher shipping costs, Pemex remains firm on maintaining current pricing strategies without discounts to retain U.S. clients.
This strategic pivot by Pemex highlights the adaptive nature of global energy markets, where geopolitical shifts can lead to significant reallocation of resources and trade routes.
What long-term implications might these changes have on the relationship between Mexico and the United States in the energy sector?
The U.S. President's threat to impose reciprocal tariffs on Canadian dairy and lumber is a response to what he calls "tremendously high" tariffs imposed by the Canadian government, sparking concerns about trade tensions between the two nations. Trump has already suspended tariffs on certain goods from Canada and Mexico in an effort to help automakers, but warned that reciprocal tariffs would be implemented if Ottawa drops its current rates. The move is part of a broader campaign by Trump to pressure the Canadian government into changing its trade policies.
This escalation in trade tensions could have far-reaching consequences for the global economy, particularly for industries such as agriculture and manufacturing that rely on cross-border trade.
How will the impact of these tariffs on small businesses and farmers in both the U.S. and Canada be mitigated or addressed by governments and industry leaders?
Oil futures have plummeted to multi-year lows amid growing concerns about a trade war's impact on economic growth and excess oil supply entering the market. The decrease in oil prices has dragged energy stocks down, with the S&P 500 Energy Select ETF falling more than 1% year-to-date. As tensions between the US and its trading partners escalate, oil markets are under pressure to break below their two-year range.
The current volatility in oil prices highlights the precarious nature of global trade relationships, where even small changes can have a significant impact on supply and demand dynamics.
How will the ongoing trade tensions and potential relaxation of sanctions against Russia affect the global energy landscape, particularly in terms of price stability and supply security?
Two years of economic growth may be wiped off permanently. Unemployment could rise to 8% from 6.6% in January, analysts say. At least 90% chance of Bank of Canada cutting rates next week.
The escalating trade tensions between the US and Canada will likely have far-reaching consequences for small businesses and entrepreneurs on both sides of the border, highlighting the need for more effective support systems to mitigate the impact of tariffs.
As the global economic landscape becomes increasingly unpredictable, how can governments and policymakers work together to create a more resilient and inclusive economy that prioritizes fairness, stability, and long-term growth?
Canada will maintain its retaliatory tariffs against US-made products as long as President Donald Trump pursues a trade war, said Mark Carney, Canada's new prime minister-designate. The Canadian government has already imposed 25% levies on C$30 billion worth of items, including orange juice, coffee, and fruit, in response to the Trump administration's tariffs. This move is seen as a way for Canada to assert its sovereignty and protect its interests.
This hardline stance by Carney underscores the deep-seated frustration among Canadian politicians towards Trump's trade policies, which they view as unduly aggressive and damaging to their country's economy.
How will the ongoing tensions between Canada and the US impact the global trade landscape, particularly in regions such as North America and beyond?
Energy executives gathering for CERAWeek in Houston are grappling with the complexities of President Donald Trump's policies, which have sparked both hope and uncertainty within the fossil fuel sector. While Trump's administration has lifted certain restrictions and promised increased production, the economic instability caused by his tariffs and sanctions has led to declining oil prices and potential disruptions in investment strategies. As the industry faces a challenging landscape, the conference is expected to reflect a mix of enthusiasm for regulatory support and anxiety over the unpredictable economic climate.
This duality captures the essence of the current energy market, where the allure of deregulation is overshadowed by the risks associated with volatile political decisions, prompting companies to reassess their long-term strategies.
In what ways might energy companies adapt to the instability created by political leaders, and what new strategies will emerge to mitigate these risks?
Canada will continue to engage with the Trump administration about tariffs imposed by the United States, despite Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's acknowledgment of a "trade war" between the two countries. The Canadian government has maintained its 25% tariffs on $30 billion of U.S. imports since January, and Trudeau indicated these measures would remain in place until the trade action is lifted. Trudeau's comments reflect ongoing tensions between the two nations over trade policies.
This escalation underscores the challenges of navigating complex trade relationships between large economic powers, where brinksmanship can often be a path to negotiating concessions.
What implications might this prolonged trade stalemate have for Canada's economy and its ability to diversify away from U.S. exports?
Oil prices suddenly broke out of a months-long slumber this week to touch a three-year low, prompting traders to reassess the trajectory of the crude market. The bearish sentiment is driven by a confluence of factors, including OPEC's surprise announcement to boost supplies, US President Donald Trump's trade tensions, and geopolitical risks cooling in Ukraine. Speculators are now wagering that the slide isn't over.
This intensification of bearish sentiment could have far-reaching implications for global energy markets, potentially disrupting supply chains and pricing strategies.
What role will geopolitics play in shaping oil prices going forward, particularly as the US-China trade war and Russia-Ukraine conflict continue to evolve?
Doug Ford has threatened to cut off power supply to the US if President Donald Trump continues with tariffs against Canada, in a move that could have significant implications for energy trade between the two countries. The Ontario premier has announced a retaliatory plan, including a 25% surcharge on Canadian electricity exports to three US states: Michigan, New York and Minnesota. This measure is aimed at punishing the US for imposing tariffs on Canadian goods, but it also risks disrupting the power supply to millions of Americans in those states.
The use of tariffs as a tool to enforce national interests highlights the increasingly complex web of trade relationships between nations, where seemingly small actions can have far-reaching consequences.
How will the global energy market respond if countries like Canada and the US begin using trade sanctions as a means to protect their economic interests?
Oil prices have declined for a fourth consecutive session as U.S. crude stockpiles reported a larger-than-expected increase, exacerbating investor concerns regarding OPEC+ output plans and U.S. tariffs on Canada and China. Brent crude futures fell to their lowest level since December 2021, while West Texas Intermediate crude reached its lowest since May 2023, reflecting broader market anxieties about economic growth and energy demand. The situation is compounded by geopolitical tensions and OPEC+'s decision to gradually increase output, raising uncertainty about future price stability.
The interplay between rising crude inventories and geopolitical tensions underscores the delicate balance oil markets must navigate, highlighting the impact of both domestic policies and international relations on pricing dynamics.
How might changes in U.S. energy policy influence global oil market stability in the context of escalating trade tensions?
Canada is poised to engage in early talks with the United States on reviewing the North American free trade pact, with a focus on addressing trade friction and preventing "dumping" by China into the North American market. The country's finance minister, Dominic LeBlanc, expressed readiness to move quickly towards a broader negotiation that sorts out many points of contention between the three nations. Canada is also prepared to work with the White House to hash out further measures to prevent Chinese dumping, following the imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, steel, and aluminum last year.
The complex web of trade tensions and retaliatory measures in North America may ultimately lead to a more nuanced understanding of the true costs and benefits of protectionism, forcing policymakers to reevaluate their assumptions about the impact of tariffs.
Will the upcoming review of the USMCA serve as an opportunity for Canada to push back against what it perceives as unfair trade practices by its largest trading partner, or will it succumb to pressure to make concessions in exchange for continued access to the US market?
U.S. President Donald Trump has announced plans to impose tariffs on Canadian dairy and lumber products in response to what he describes as "tremendously high" tariffs imposed by Canada. The move is part of a broader trade dispute between the two countries, with Trump accusing Canada of unfairly targeting American industries. The Trump administration is also seeking to increase its share of the market for these commodities.
This escalating trade war highlights the vulnerabilities of global supply chains in the face of protectionist policies and could have far-reaching consequences for businesses operating across borders.
How will the imposition of tariffs on Canadian dairy and lumber products impact the already fragile relationship between the U.S. and Canada, potentially jeopardizing bilateral economic ties?
Canada is seeking private investors to develop its airports at an accelerated pace, highlighting the country's efforts to boost domestic investment and offset economic pressures from a trade war with the US. The government is promoting a new model of airport development that allows for partnerships between public and private entities, aiming to tap into the expertise and capital of foreign investors. By doing so, Canada aims to support its air transportation system's growth and modernization.
This initiative underscores the importance of diversifying domestic investment channels in times of economic uncertainty, potentially providing a much-needed boost to Canada's economy.
How will the involvement of private investors in airport development impact the long-term sustainability and public-private partnerships in Canada's infrastructure sector?