China to Publish Policy to Boost RISC-V Chip Use Nationwide, Sources Say
China plans to issue guidance to encourage the use of open-source RISC-V chips nationwide for the first time, two sources briefed on the matter said, as Beijing accelerates efforts to curb the country's dependence on Western-owned technology. The policy guidance is being drafted jointly by eight government bodies and could be released soon. Chinese chip design firms have eagerly embraced RISC-V, seeing its lower costs as a major attraction.
As China seeks to increase its domestic semiconductor production, the success of RISC-V in boosting adoption could serve as a model for other countries looking to diversify their tech industries.
How will the widespread adoption of RISC-V chips in China impact the global balance of power in the technology sector, particularly with regards to supply chains and intellectual property?
China's government is pivoting towards promoting open-source RISC-V chips as part of its strategy to enhance semiconductor self-sufficiency and reduce reliance on foreign technologies like x86 and Arm. The initiative, drafted by multiple government agencies, marks the first official push for RISC-V adoption in the country, with several domestic companies already investing in its development. While the hardware development is significant, the success of RISC-V will heavily depend on the establishment of a robust software ecosystem, a challenge that could take years to overcome.
The shift to RISC-V reflects a broader trend where countries are seeking technological independence, potentially reshaping global semiconductor dynamics and supply chains.
How will the pursuit of RISC-V influence the competitive landscape of AI technologies and broader semiconductor markets in the coming years?
China is reportedly drafting policy guidance to encourage the local use of open-source RISC-V chips, which could be announced before the end of the month. The XiangShan project, initiated by China's Academy of Sciences in 2019, aims to roll out the open-source chip with the same name, and recent updates suggest steady progress. As the lower costs involved make RISC-V chips an attractive option for Chinese companies, the move could also enhance the country's technological sovereignty.
The push towards local use of RISC-V chips may serve as a strategic tool for China to reduce its dependence on foreign technology and promote domestic innovation in the chip industry.
How will the increased adoption of open-source RISC-V chips impact the global semiconductor market, potentially altering the balance of power between major tech players?
A recent study reveals that China has significantly outpaced the United States in research on next-generation chipmaking technologies, conducting more than double the output of U.S. institutions. Between 2018 and 2023, China produced 34% of global research in this field, while the U.S. contributed only 15%, raising concerns about America's competitive edge in future technological advancements. As China focuses on innovative areas such as neuromorphic and optoelectric computing, the effectiveness of U.S. export restrictions may diminish, potentially altering the landscape of chip manufacturing.
This development highlights the potential for a paradigm shift in global technology leadership, where traditional dominance by the U.S. could be challenged by China's growing research capabilities.
What strategies can the U.S. adopt to reinvigorate its position in semiconductor research and development in the face of China's rapid advancements?
Alibaba's latest move with the launch of its C930 server processor demonstrates the company's commitment to developing its own high-performance computing solutions, which could significantly impact the global tech landscape. By leveraging RISC-V's open-source design and avoiding licensing fees and geopolitical restrictions, Alibaba is well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for AI and cloud infrastructure. The new chip's development by DAMO Academy reflects the increasing importance of homegrown innovation in China.
The widespread adoption of RISC-V could fundamentally shift the balance of power in the global tech industry, as companies with diverse ecosystems and proprietary architectures are increasingly challenged by open-source alternatives.
How will the integration of RISC-V-based processors into mainstream computing devices impact the industry's long-term strategy for AI development, particularly when it comes to low-cost high-performance computing models?
The launch of Alibaba's XuanTie C930 marks a significant milestone in the company's push for dominance in the emerging RISC-V CPU market. As the global landscape becomes increasingly hostile to Chinese tech companies due to U.S. export laws and trade tensions, Alibaba is seeking to capitalize on its expertise in cloud-server CPU design. With the C930, Alibaba aims to strengthen its position as a leader in AI and HPC computing.
The widespread adoption of RISC-V technology by Chinese companies such as Alibaba represents a strategic response to the challenges posed by U.S. export laws and trade restrictions, highlighting the growing importance of domestic innovation and self-sufficiency.
How will the ongoing development and commercialization of RISC-V CPUs in China impact the broader global semiconductor landscape and the competitive dynamics between established players like Intel?
Despite strict export controls imposed by the U.S., Chinese firms can still acquire banned Nvidia GPUs through intermediaries in nearby countries. The high demand for these chips has created a lucrative market in China, with traders willing to pay premium prices to circumvent American sanctions. However, the effectiveness of these bans remains uncertain due to the vast customer base and complex supply chain of Nvidia.
The ease with which Chinese companies can find ways to work around U.S. export controls highlights the challenges of enforcing strict trade regulations in a globalized economy.
What will be the long-term consequences for the global semiconductor industry if the U.S. continues to struggle to contain China's chip ambitions?
China's technology landscape in 2025 showcases remarkable advancements across multiple sectors, with the nation steadily positioning itself as a global technology powerhouse. Tech giants, including Tencent Holdings TCEHY, Alibaba BABA, Baidu BIDU, JD.com JD and PDD Holdings PDD, are making waves to capitalize on this technological renaissance, strategically investing in AI infrastructure and emerging technologies to strengthen China's digital ecosystem. The company's cost-effective AI architecture demonstrates that competitive AI models can be built at a fraction of Western competitors' costs.
The synchronized acceleration of cutting-edge technologies like AI, EVs, and AR across multiple Chinese firms could signal an irreversible shift in the global tech landscape, with far-reaching implications for industries worldwide.
What role will China's government-backed initiatives, such as the "Manufacturing Great Power" strategy, play in shaping the long-term trajectory of its technological advancements and how might this impact international trade dynamics?
Buyers in approved countries like Taiwan and Malaysia are buying Nvidia Blackwell chips and selling a portion of them to Chinese companies, highlighting the challenges of upholding export controls on semiconductor chips made in the US. The loopholes in the system allow for anonymous traders to acquire and resell these resources to companies in China, bypassing the restrictions imposed by the US government. Despite efforts to restrict exports, Nvidia claims that unauthorized diversion of its products is being investigated and addressed.
The current export control mechanisms demonstrate a significant gap between policy intentions and practical implementation, allowing malicious actors to exploit loopholes for their own gain.
How can policymakers and industry leaders work together to strengthen export controls and prevent the misuse of advanced technologies like AI and semiconductor chips?
The U.S. Trade Representative's Office is set to hold a hearing focused on older Chinese-made "legacy" semiconductors, which may result in additional U.S. tariffs aimed at protecting domestic chip manufacturers from China's growing influence in the semiconductor market. This investigation, initiated under the Biden administration, highlights concerns over the origin of chips used in a variety of U.S. products, including those in critical sectors like defense. As tensions between the U.S. and China escalate, the hearing will address the potential economic repercussions of tariffs on consumers and industries reliant on these legacy chips.
This hearing underscores the complexities of global supply chains and the delicate balance between protecting national interests and maintaining market stability amid rising geopolitical tensions.
What long-term strategies should the U.S. adopt to safeguard its semiconductor industry without exacerbating inflation and harming consumers?
China said on Wednesday it would boost support for the application of artificial intelligence (AI) models and the development of venture capital investment, in a bid to foster more technology breakthroughs and become more self-reliant. The country aims to create an enabling environment for innovation that encourages exploration and tolerates failure. To achieve this, China plans to explore new models for national laboratories and give strong support to young scientists and engineers.
By providing significant resources to AI research and development, China is likely to accelerate its technological advancements in the coming years, potentially narrowing the gap with other countries.
What role will international cooperation play in shaping the global landscape of AI innovation, as China's ambitions become increasingly interconnected with those of other nations?
Enforcing tariffs on Taiwan would be difficult, and they wouldn’t necessarily be enough to meaningfully increase semiconductor manufacturing in the United States, experts told WIRED. The move could lead to disruptions in global supply chains, potentially affecting not just the US but also other countries reliant on Taiwanese chip exports. The outcome of this decision will depend on various factors, including the effectiveness of potential mitigation strategies.
This policy shift highlights the increasingly complex and interconnected nature of modern economies, where a single action by one nation can have far-reaching consequences for global trade and industry.
What would be the long-term impact on the US-China tech rivalry if tariffs on Taiwanese chips were to increase significantly?
The Trump administration's proposed export restrictions on artificial intelligence semiconductors have sparked opposition from major US tech companies, with Microsoft, Amazon, and Nvidia urging President Trump to reconsider the regulations that could limit access to key markets. The policy, introduced by the Biden administration, would restrict exports to certain countries deemed "strategically vital," potentially limiting America's influence in the global semiconductor market. Industry leaders are warning that such restrictions could allow China to gain a strategic advantage in AI technology.
The push from US tech giants highlights the growing unease among industry leaders about the potential risks of export restrictions on chip production, particularly when it comes to ensuring the flow of critical components.
Will the US government be willing to make significant concessions to maintain its relationships with key allies and avoid a technological arms race with China?
The announcement by Chinese Premier Li Qiang of support for emerging industries such as biomanufacturing, quantum technology, AI, and 6G technology has sparked a broad-based rally among China's most widely followed technology stocks. The show of support was unexpected to market watchers, but it has helped to stoke investor sentiment and reinforce the country's commitment to supporting its tech sector. This development is part of a larger effort by the Chinese government to promote innovation and economic growth in key industries.
The surprise announcement highlights the government's willingness to provide financial backing for cutting-edge technologies that could potentially drive China's competitiveness on the global stage.
Will the promised support for emerging tech industries translate into tangible investment and concrete policy changes, or will it remain a promise made without a clear plan of action?
U.S. chip stocks have stumbled this year, with investors shifting their focus to software companies in search of the next big thing in artificial intelligence. The emergence of lower-cost AI models from China's DeepSeek has dimmed demand for semiconductors, while several analysts see software's rise as a longer-term evolution in the AI space. As attention shifts away from semiconductor shares, some investors are betting on software companies to benefit from the growth of AI technology.
The rotation out of chip stocks and into software companies may be a sign that investors are recognizing the limitations of semiconductors in driving long-term growth in the AI space.
What role will governments play in regulating the development and deployment of AI, and how might this impact the competitive landscape for software companies?
The reported illegal shipments of TSMC chips to China's Huawei are a significant concern, as they raise questions about the effectiveness of export control policies and the ability to enforce them. The use of foreign-made chips in sensitive technologies is a critical issue, particularly given the ongoing technology war between the US and China. The Commerce Department's handling of these issues will have far-reaching implications for national security and the global balance of power.
This case highlights the need for greater transparency and cooperation between governments and industry players to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
How will the international community respond if TSMC or other companies continue to circumvent export controls, potentially providing China with access to cutting-edge technologies that could be used against national interests?
Ray Dalio has warned that the U.S. won't be competitive in manufacturing with China for AI chips, arguing that China will continue to have an edge in producing applications for these chips compared to the U.S. The U.S. advantage in AI development lies in its investment in higher education and research, but manufacturing is a different story, according to Dalio. Despite some US efforts to ramp up chip production, China's focus on applying AI to existing technologies gives them an economic advantage.
The stark reality is that the US has become so reliant on foreign-made components in its technology industry that it may never be able to shake off this dependency.
Can the US government find a way to reinvigorate its chip manufacturing sector before China becomes too far ahead in the AI chip game?
The US rule aimed at restricting access to advanced computing chips for countries including China could ultimately push them ahead in the AI race by forcing companies like Huawei and ZTE to build non-US alliances with China. Microsoft argues that this would be a "surefire way" to secure China's dominance in AI, citing concerns that countries like Brazil and India will be pushed into building new relationships with China. The US may not anticipate the complexities of global AI landscape that this rule could create.
This move highlights the intricate web of international alliances and rivalries that can emerge when a major power attempts to restrict access to critical technologies.
What implications might this have for the global balance of power in areas beyond just AI, where technological advancements are increasingly intertwined with geopolitics?
Nvidia's stock has taken a hit as reports surfaced of its AI chips reaching China, raising concerns about further scrutiny around exports. The company's latest Blackwell chips have been found to be reaching China through third-party resellers in violation of export controls. Nvidia has denied accountability for these sales, but investors are growing increasingly concerned about the impact on future revenue.
As the tech industry continues to grapple with global supply chain complexities and regulatory pressures, companies like Nvidia must navigate a treacherous landscape where even small missteps can have significant consequences.
What role will governments play in policing chip exports, and how might this evolving regulatory framework shape the long-term trajectory of companies like Nvidia?
Microsoft has warned President Trump that current export restrictions on critical computer chips needed for AI technology could give China a strategic advantage, undermining US leadership in the sector. The restrictions, imposed by the Biden administration, limit the export of American AI components to many foreign markets, affecting not only China but also allies such as Taiwan, South Korea, India, and Switzerland. By loosening these constraints, Microsoft argues that the US can strengthen its position in the global AI market while reducing its trade deficit.
If the US fails to challenge China's growing dominance in AI technology, it risks ceding control over a critical component of modern warfare and economic prosperity.
What would be the implications for the global economy if China were able to widely adopt its own domestically developed AI chips, potentially disrupting the supply chains that underpin many industries?
Singapore's recent fraud case has unveiled a potential smuggling network involving AI chips, raising concerns for Nvidia, Dell, and regulatory bodies worldwide. Three individuals have been charged in connection with the case, which is not tied to U.S. actions but coincides with heightened scrutiny over AI chip exports to China. The investigation's implications extend beyond Singapore, potentially affecting the entire semiconductor supply chain and increasing pressure on major companies like Nvidia and Dell.
This incident reflects the growing complexities and geopolitical tensions surrounding the semiconductor industry, highlighting the interconnectedness of global supply chains in the face of regulatory challenges.
What might be the long-term consequences for Nvidia and its competitors if regulatory scrutiny intensifies in the AI chip market?
Nvidia's stock plummeted 8.8% on Monday as reports emerged that its AI chips were reaching China despite export controls, raising concerns about the tech giant's ability to enforce its own regulations. The company's latest Blackwell chips are allegedly being sold through third-party resellers in nearby regions, violating US export restrictions. Nvidia's stock has fallen nearly 12% over the past five days, with shares trading at levels just over their 2025 low.
The ease with which China is able to circumvent export controls on sensitive technologies highlights the need for more robust and effective regulations in the global tech industry.
How will the ongoing diplomatic tensions between the US and China affect Nvidia's long-term business prospects and strategic partnerships?
Nvidia's stock is retreating after an analyst at Japanese bank Mizuho warned that the U.S. could eventually prevent the tech giant from selling any of its chips to Chinese entities. A Total Ban Could Be Imposed. The Biden administration has already prevented NVDA and its peers from shipping their most advanced chips to China, and the Trump administration is mulling over the idea of increasing the number of NVDA chips that cannot be shipped to China without licenses. What's more, the administration is also pressuring its allies to put curbs on the export of chip-making equipment to the Asian country.
The escalating tensions over Nvidia's Chinese sales could have far-reaching implications for the global semiconductor industry, forcing companies to reevaluate their supply chains and manufacturing strategies.
How will a blanket ban on Nvidia's chip sales to China impact the company's relationships with its major customers in the United States and Europe?
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) continues to assert its dominance in the semiconductor industry, leveraging its position to attract investment despite geopolitical tensions. The company has committed $100 billion to U.S. manufacturing and R&D, enhancing its global supply-chain security while catering to its American clientele, including major tech firms. As TSMC diversifies its operations beyond Taiwan, it not only mitigates risks but also fosters closer collaboration with U.S. partners, positioning itself favorably for future growth.
This strategic pivot underscores how economic imperatives can drive corporate decisions even amid challenging political landscapes, highlighting the intricate interplay between technology and geopolitics.
What implications will TSMC's expansion in the U.S. have for the global semiconductor supply chain and the competitive landscape among tech companies?
Investors are advised to consider Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) as promising stocks in the AI chip market, given the expected growth in data center spending and the increasing demand for advanced processing technologies. Nvidia has demonstrated remarkable performance with a significant increase in revenue driven by its dominance in the data center sector, while TSMC continues to support various chip manufacturers with its cutting-edge manufacturing processes. Both companies are poised to benefit from the rapid advancements in AI, positioning them as strong contenders for future investment.
The success of these two companies reflects a broader trend in the tech industry, where the race for AI capabilities is driving innovation and profitability for chip manufacturers.
What challenges might emerge in the chip industry as demand surges, and how will companies adapt to maintain their competitive edge?
The revelation that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has produced hundreds of thousands of chips destined for China's Huawei is a "huge concern" according to U.S. President Donald Trump's nominee to oversee export policy, Jeffrey Kessler. This report raises questions about the effectiveness of current regulations and enforcement mechanisms in preventing such shipments. The U.S. technology industry is caught in a high-stakes game with China, where chip design and AI capabilities are key battlegrounds.
The fact that TSMC has continued to supply chips to Huawei despite previous orders to halt shipments highlights the need for more robust export control policies and better cooperation between regulatory agencies.
What specific measures can be taken by the U.S. government to address this issue, including potential reforms to its export control laws and regulations?