Polling stations open across Germany with shift to right expected
Germany's national election is likely to see a significant shift to the right, as polls suggest that Friedrich Merz's conservatives will regain power and the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) will score its best ever result. The country's economic struggles have contributed to a growing sense of discontent among voters, who are looking for change. As the election results become clear, it remains to be seen how this shift in politics will impact Germany's relationships with other European countries.
This election marks a significant turning point in German history, as the country's traditional center-left parties struggle to regain traction in the face of economic uncertainty and social discontent.
How will Germany's new right-wing government navigate the complex web of alliances and rivalries within Europe, particularly given its strained relationships with France and other key European partners?
Germany's conservatives are facing defeat in Sunday's Hamburg regional vote, just one week after leader Friedrich Merz's victory over Chancellor Olaf Scholz's Social Democrats in the national election. The current SPD mayor, Peter Tschentscher, is expected to win with 33% of the vote and will likely continue governing in a coalition with the Greens as junior partners. The Hamburg regional election marks a significant shift for the conservative party, which has ruled the northern port city for most of the past 80 years.
This outcome could signal a broader decline in support for Merkel's legacy politics among German voters, potentially setting a precedent for future electoral challenges to center-right parties.
How will the implications of this regional defeat affect Merz's chances of becoming the next Chancellor of Germany?
Friedrich Merz's conservatives and the Social Democrats (SPD) have successfully concluded preliminary coalition talks, emphasizing a commitment to stricter measures on illegal migration and economic growth. Merz aims for Germany to achieve 1-2% growth after two years of contraction while increasing military spending and state borrowing to revive the economy. The next phase involves negotiations with the Green party, which will be crucial for passing proposed fiscal measures.
This coalition represents a significant shift in German politics, reflecting broader trends in Europe where migration and security have become central issues for mainstream parties in response to the rise of far-right movements.
Will the coalition's proposed changes to immigration and economic policy resonate with the electorate, or will they face backlash from constituents who prioritize different issues?
The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has submitted urgent legal motions to the constitutional court, seeking to block a planned convening of the outgoing German parliament to consider a significant half-trillion-euro spending package. The proposed changes aim to expand defense and infrastructure spending, sparking concerns about potential constitutional implications. However, the far-right party is challenging this move due to concerns over its legitimacy.
This attempt by AfD highlights the increasing tensions between traditional parties and the growing influence of populist movements in shaping Germany's legislative agenda.
Can the German constitution be altered without a more inclusive and representative process that engages with a wider range of voices, including those from the far-right party?
Friedrich Merz, Germany's chancellor-in-waiting and leader of the Christian Democratic Union party CDU, is racing against time to win over crucial Greens' party support for a massive 500 billion euro infrastructure fund and borrowing rule overhaul. The proposed reforms could jolt markets and spark debate about whether they will revive Europe's largest economy. Germany's conservatives and the SPD are working together on the proposals, which aim to address concerns about economic growth and competitiveness.
This move marks an unusual shift for conservative German politics, as it relies heavily on coalition-building efforts and seeks support from a key environmental party like the Greens.
Will the proposed reforms succeed in revitalizing Germany's economy and setting a precedent for other European countries to follow?
Friedrich Merz's conservatives and the Social Democrats (SPD) have concluded preliminary discussions aimed at forming a coalition government, outlining a comprehensive 11-page position paper on key policy areas. The proposed measures include stricter border controls, a reformed welfare system, energy price reductions, and targeted economic growth strategies, alongside support for industries deemed strategic. The coalition's success hinges on legislative approval of significant financial measures, including a 500-billion-euro infrastructure fund, which faces opposition from various political factions.
This coalition signifies a pivotal shift in German politics, as the new government's focus on integration, economic recovery, and strategic industries reflects broader trends in European governance amid global challenges.
How will the coalition navigate the competing interests of its diverse constituents while trying to implement these ambitious reforms?
Germany's Greens are signaling potential refusal to support Friedrich Merz's plans for a significant increase in state borrowing, with concerns rising over the approval process as negotiations progress. The proposed reforms include a special 500 billion euro infrastructure fund aimed at revitalizing the economy, but the Greens demand more climate protection measures to be integrated into the plans. As the political landscape shifts with an incoming parliament, the dynamics between Merz, the Greens, and other coalition partners could complicate the path to passing these crucial measures.
This situation illustrates the intricate balance required in coalition politics, where competing priorities and demands can either forge a path to progress or lead to legislative gridlock.
What implications might the Greens' stance have on future coalitions and the approach to economic policy in Germany?
Austria's first three-party government since the aftermath of World War Two took office on Monday, ending the country's longest-ever wait for a ruling coalition and keeping the Russia-friendly, far-right Freedom Party (FPO) out of power. The centrist alternative formed by the conservative People's Party (OVP), Social Democrats (SPO), and liberal Neos has overcome their earlier failure to do a deal, vowing to cooperate and get things done. Despite concerns about its fragility, the new government is focused on shrinking Austria's budget deficit and implementing stricter immigration rules.
The formation of this three-party government marks a significant shift in Austrian politics, where the far right was previously seen as an outsider party, but now finds itself at the center of power.
As the FPO's influence wanes, what implications will this have for Austria's relationships with neighboring countries and its stance on European integration?
Musk's promotion of Germany's far-right party, Alternative fur Deutschland, had little impact on election results, despite his efforts to amplify its figures through 2 dozen posts on X and an interview with its leader. The AfD's stunning second-place result in the February 23 election suggests that Musk's support may have been more symbolic than substantive. Despite this, Tesla is already feeling the effects of Musk's politics, with European sales tumbling 45% in January from a year earlier.
The extent to which Musk's far-right activism has influenced his business decisions, such as prioritizing regulatory relief over customer needs, remains unclear and warrants closer examination.
Can Tesla recover its lost sales momentum by distancing itself from Musk's divisive rhetoric and refocusing on the products that drove its initial success?
German lawmakers are set to debate a 500-billion-euro infrastructure fund and significant changes to state borrowing rules aimed at boosting defense spending and economic growth, with votes scheduled before the formation of a new parliament. The proposed reforms reflect a dramatic shift from Germany's traditional fiscal conservatism, driven by increasing geopolitical tensions and a perceived need for improved national security. However, these measures face potential roadblocks from far-right and radical-left factions that may gain more influence in the newly elected parliament.
The urgency surrounding these debates underscores the shifting political landscape in Europe, as nations reconsider their defense strategies amid rising global uncertainties.
What long-term implications could this borrowing strategy have on Germany's economic stability and its role within the European Union?
Beate Meinl-Reisinger, leader of Austria's small, liberal Neos party, called on party members to make history on Sunday and support what she sees as a move supporting liberal democracy as they voted on whether to join a proposed coalition government. Three centrist parties announced coalition deal last week; Neos members must approve the deal to join next government if they do not, two-party coalition has one-seat majority. Government to be sworn in on Monday after historic wait.
The historic nature of this vote underscores the importance of centrism in maintaining a balanced government, where no single party holds absolute power.
As Austria's future government takes shape, how will its policies impact the country's relations with neighboring countries and the European Union?
Germany's conservative parties and the Social Democrats (SPD) have reached a consensus to pursue reforms to the country's debt brake, aiming to facilitate increased defense spending and the establishment of a substantial 500 billion euro infrastructure fund. This agreement highlights the urgency of addressing national challenges and reflects a strategic shift in fiscal policy to bolster economic resilience. The collaborative effort showcases a willingness to adapt to changing geopolitical demands while balancing fiscal responsibility.
This development signifies a potential turning point in Germany's economic policy, potentially reshaping the nation's approach to defense and infrastructure investment in response to global pressures.
What implications might this reform have on Germany's long-term economic stability and its role within the European Union?
Some on Europe's far-right are torn about Trump's dressing-down of Zelenskiy and his seeming indifference to the perceived threat Putin poses. Orban, Chrupalla, Salvini side with Trump's tilt towards RussiaOthers such as Meloni, Farage and Le Pen more guardedDivergence shows European far right far from cohesive group. The divisions within Europe's far-right movement over Trump's approach to ending Ukraine war are exposing deep fissures among the party members.
This divergence highlights how far-right populist movements are struggling to come together on a unified stance, especially when it comes to issues of foreign policy and national security.
How will these internal divisions affect the ability of far-right parties to present a cohesive front in European Union politics?
Germany's recent decision to overhaul its fiscal policies marks a significant shift that could revitalize Europe's struggling economy, positioning the nation as a central economic force once again. The proposed spending plans, including a 500 billion euro infrastructure fund and increased defense expenditures, reflect a proactive response to geopolitical threats and a desire for greater economic autonomy. This transformation in fiscal strategy could have far-reaching implications not just for Germany, but for the entire European Union, as it attempts to recover from stagnation and reinvigorate growth.
This bold fiscal pivot suggests a potential paradigm shift in how European nations might approach economic challenges, prioritizing investment over austerity in a bid for resilience and growth.
What long-term impacts might this fiscal strategy have on the political landscape within the EU, especially regarding countries with differing economic philosophies?
Tesla saw its sales volume in Germany decline by more than three quarters in February, according to the German road traffic agency KBA, even though sales of electric vehicles picked up overall. The company's struggles in Germany are part of a broader trend, with sales declines also reported in Scandinavia and France. Overall, Tesla's European sales have been impacted by its CEO Elon Musk's support for far-right parties, which may have alienated some customers.
This decline highlights the challenges facing electric vehicle manufacturers in Europe, where growing competition from traditional automakers and changing government policies are eroding market share.
What will be the long-term impact of Tesla's struggles in Europe on its global market position and ability to maintain its lead in the electric vehicle industry?
Goldman Sachs and Nomura have lifted their expectations for Germany's economic growth in 2025 due to increased military and infrastructure spending, which is expected to boost the country's economy and have spillover effects on its European neighbors. Goldman expects a 0.2% growth rate for Europe's largest economy, up from 0.8%, while Nomura predicts a pace of euro area economic growth could be lifted by 0.2 percentage points per quarter by the end of 2026. The fiscal news is also expected to lower pressure on the European Central Bank to reduce rates below neutral.
The significant boost in military and infrastructure spending in Germany may lead to a shift in the global economic landscape, with potential implications for trade flows, foreign investment, and economic growth in other countries.
Will this increase in government spending have a disproportionate impact on the already strained public finances of smaller European nations, and could it exacerbate existing fiscal imbalances?
Germany's likely next chancellor, Friedrich Merz, is considering setting up special funds worth nearly a trillion euros to finance urgent defence and infrastructure spending, prompting double-digit percentage rises in shares in defence contractors. The proposed funds would amount to 20% of German GDP, with economists proposing sums of 400 billion euros and 500 billion euros respectively. This fiscal sea change would be unprecedented since the Cold War, sending Europe's defence stocks soaring.
The proposed defence fund highlights Germany's recognition of its need for a significant military overhaul, one that has been long overdue given its history of being a defence laggard.
What implications will this sudden surge in defence spending have on Germany's relationship with NATO and its role in global security initiatives?
Germany's coalition agreed a landmark deal to exempt defense spending from its harsh debt brakes, in addition to unveiling a $535 billion infrastructure pledge. The country announced plans to change its constitution and abandon its long-standing commitment to fiscal prudence. Germany finally unveiled a plan that could address years of economic decline and the war in Ukraine as the country announced plans to change its constitution and abandon its long-standing commitment to fiscal prudence.
This historic shift in policy could mark a turning point for Germany's economy, potentially reigniting growth and competitiveness by unleashing pent-up spending on vital infrastructure projects.
What implications might this new direction have for Europe's collective security and defense posture, as a major power like Germany seeks to reassert its influence amidst rising tensions with Russia?
Talks between Germany's conservatives and Social Democrats (SPD) focused on forming a coalition amid plans to increase military spending in Europe. A nearly trillion euro borrowing boom is seen as a way to fund infrastructure and defense spending. The proposal includes 400 billion euros for the German military and 500 billion euros for infrastructure.
This potential surge in government spending could have far-reaching consequences for Germany's economy, including inflationary pressures and strain on public finances.
How will the impact of increased military spending on global geopolitics be assessed by international partners, particularly given the current tensions between Russia and Ukraine?
Germany's historic plan to ramp up spending has sent shockwaves through European markets, with equities surging past their US peers and the euro reviving from its brink of parity with the dollar. The benchmark stock index surged 3.4% in its biggest one-day rally since 2022, lifting the pan-European Stoxx 600 to near a record. Yields on benchmark 10-year bunds soared 30 basis points, marking a dramatic shift away from Germany's traditional controls on government borrowing.
This sudden change in policy could have far-reaching implications for the European economy and the broader global financial system, potentially leading to increased inflation and fiscal stimulus that may require swift monetary policy responses.
How will the consequences of Germany's 'whatever it takes' moment reverberate across the globe, particularly among nations with limited fiscal flexibility or struggling economies?
The yield on Germany's 10-year bonds surged 30 basis points, their worst day since the fall of the Berlin Wall, as Chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz unveiled a sweeping fiscal overhaul that will unlock hundreds of billions of euros for defense and infrastructure investments. The plan has prompted hopes that it will boost the European economy and put the euro on track for its best three-day run since 2015. However, investors have long argued that Germany's tight fiscal constraints are hampering national growth.
The massive injection of government spending could be seen as a deliberate attempt to recalibrate Europe's economic strategy away from austerity and towards a more expansionary approach, similar to Japan’s post-bubble recovery.
Will the German debt crisis serve as a catalyst for a broader reassessment of European fiscal policy and its implications for the global economy?
The state of Western Australia will hold its final political contest before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese calls a national election, with the outcome expected to influence his re-election prospects. Albanese's Labor party is widely favored to win, but the conservative opposition Liberal party hopes to weaken their grip on power and pressure the Prime Minister. The ruling party has maintained a strong presence in the state parliament, with Premier Roger Cook likely to secure a third consecutive term.
This Western Australian poll could be a turning point for Albanese's re-election campaign, as the Prime Minister looks to shore up support among voters in the crucial swing state of Western Australia.
Can Labor maintain its strong hold on power if it fails to win a majority in the national election, and what implications might this have for Albanese's leadership?
Georgescu has vowed to contest the decision at the Constitutional Court, despite analysts predicting an unfavorable outcome, which could further destabilize Romania's already tense political landscape. The far-right candidate's bid for the presidency has sparked tensions both domestically and internationally, with critics accusing him of promoting divisive rhetoric and potentially undermining Romania's pro-Western orientation. As the country teeters on the brink of turmoil, Georgescu's fate serves as a microcosm for the larger debate over democratic values and the role of extremist ideologies in modern politics.
The fragility of democratic institutions in countries with a history of authoritarianism makes it essential to scrutinize challenges like Georgescu's closely, lest they inadvertently pave the way for more severe erosions of civil liberties.
What implications might the outcome of this case have for other Eastern European nations struggling with similar issues of far-right extremism and democratic backsliding?
The rejection of Calin Georgescu's candidacy in Romania's presidential election re-run has significant implications for the country's democratic process and the role of populism in European politics. The ruling party has long been accused of suppressing opposition voices, and this move may further erode trust in the electoral system. Georgescu's supporters have condemned the decision as undemocratic and are likely to challenge it at the constitutional court.
This decision highlights the need for robust mechanisms to ensure the integrity of elections in Europe, where democratic backsliding has become a pressing concern.
Will this incident spark a broader conversation about the limits of electoral oversight and the consequences of unchecked populist sentiment in Eastern European democracies?
Merz seeks talks with France and UK on sharing nuclear weapons, but not as a substitute for US protection. Germany is bound to non-nuclear defence due to its Second World War past, but participates in NATO weapons-sharing arrangements. Merz plans coalition by Easter, crucially needing Green Party support to pass key financial measures.
The proposal for shared European nuclear weapons could be seen as a pragmatic response to Russia's increasing military presence in Europe, where deterrence is a top priority.
How would the deployment of such nuclear assets affect the delicate balance between collective security and individual national sovereignty within the EU?
Barbara Hendricks, designated German Environmental Minister of the Social Democratic Party (SPD), has made it clear that fracking is off the table in Germany due to environmental concerns. The SPD politician stated that the party's coalition agreement had included a commitment to not allow fracking as long as it only uses chemicals. This move can be seen as a significant shift in the country's energy policy, putting Germany at odds with other major economies.
The decision highlights the importance of considering local environmental conditions when adopting foreign technologies, and how this could impact the global competitiveness of energy-intensive industries.
What role will international pressure play in shaping Germany's stance on fracking, particularly from countries that have heavily invested in the technology?