Trump Approval Rating Holds Steady at 44%, Reuters/Ipsos Poll Finds
U.S. President Donald Trump's approval rating held steady over the past week, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Tuesday that found 44% of respondents approved of his performance over his first month in office. The survey found that Americans' attitudes toward Trump were essentially unchanged as he fired tens of thousands of federal workers and upended the U.S. approach to the Ukraine-Russia war. Public approval of Trump's job performance so far has remained higher than it was for most of his 2017-2021 first term in office.
The steady approval rating may mask deeper concerns about Trump's leadership, as a majority of respondents still disapprove of his job performance, highlighting the need for more nuanced analysis of public opinion.
How will the ongoing support for Trump's policies on immigration and economy impact his ability to address other pressing issues, such as healthcare and climate change?
The US economy added 151,000 jobs in February, but federal employment dropped by 10,000, showing that President Trump's policy changes are starting to impact hiring. The labor market remains strong, with the unemployment rate ticking up to 4.1%, but analysts warn that the growth may be cooling down due to economic uncertainty. The government's reduction of jobs and spending is being offset by gains in other sectors, such as healthcare and financial firms.
The ongoing policy changes under Trump's administration are testing the resilience of the US labor market, which has previously been a strong indicator of economic health.
As the government continues to reduce its workforce and spending, will these cuts ultimately lead to a decline in job growth and higher unemployment rates?
The euphoria that drove stocks to record levels following Donald Trump's presidential win has evaporated as recent tariff escalations and disappointing data spark fears of slow economic growth and stubbornly elevated inflation. The market's reaction to the latest tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China has been particularly disappointing, erasing about $3.3 trillion in market cap since its record closing high. The S&P 500 is down around 2% since the start of 2025, while the Nasdaq Composite is off nearly 6%.
The floundering nature of the "Trump trade" highlights how quickly investor sentiment can shift when new information emerges, underscoring the importance of continuous monitoring of economic trends and policy developments.
Can the market recover from this current downturn if Trump's policies are ultimately found to be beneficial for the economy, or has the damage been done?
The Federal Reserve chair has reassured an audience at the University of Chicago that the economy remains steady despite "elevated uncertainty" caused by the Trump administration's latest policies. Jerome Powell acknowledged that businesses and consumers are experiencing heightened uncertainty about the economic outlook, but stressed that the Fed doesn't intend to cut rates until it can assess the effect of these policies on the economy. The economy has shown solid footing for several quarters, with inflation remaining around 3% and unemployment hovering at 4%, but there is a growing sense of unpredictability.
This heightened uncertainty may lead to a cautious approach by consumers and businesses, potentially slowing down spending and investment in the coming months.
How will the ongoing policy changes under the Trump administration impact consumer confidence and the overall stability of the US economy in the next year?
The US Federal Reserve may soon be forced to confront the consequences of its role in exacerbating economic uncertainty under the Trump administration. The latest jobs report, which showed a 50th consecutive month of net gains, could be the last of its kind for a while due to unwelcome unpredictability from the Trump administration. The future for the US economy doesn't look nearly as bright as the recent past.
The unpredictable nature of trade policies and executive actions within government agencies may have long-term effects on consumer confidence and business investment, ultimately impacting the overall health of the labor market.
How will the ongoing economic uncertainty affect the potential candidates in the 2024 presidential election?
US stocks continued their downward trend, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 0.8%, the S&P 500 dropping 1.3%, and the Nasdaq plummeting nearly 2% as investors digested concerns over the health of the US economy and President Trump's unpredictable trade policy. The market's woes were further exacerbated by worries about a potential recession, with Trump describing the economy as undergoing "a period of transition." As the political uncertainty persists, key economic data releases will be closely watched, including updates on inflation and corporate earnings.
This selloff in major US indexes reflects a broader concern that the economic growth slowdown may be more persistent than initially anticipated, which could have far-reaching implications for investors worldwide.
What are the potential policy implications of Trump's trade policies on the global economy, particularly if his administration continues to pursue protectionist measures?
Weaker-than-expected data has led to a decline in US economic growth forecasts, with some economists now predicting a slower pace of growth than initially thought. The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tool projects a 2.8% decline in the first quarter, down from a previous projection of a 1.5% decline. Uncertainty around President Trump's tariff policy appears to be weighing on business activity, particularly in the manufacturing sector.
This weakening economic outlook underscores the vulnerability of global supply chains, where timely delivery of parts is crucial for meeting production goals, and may signal a more prolonged period of economic uncertainty.
Will policymakers respond to the growing concerns about trade tensions with aggressive monetary easing or fiscal stimulus, potentially alleviating some pressure on business investment and consumer spending?
Voters are suddenly feeling gloomier than they have in months, despite President Biden's initial promise of an economy in shambles being rebranded as a "resurgence". Consumer confidence has plummeted to the lowest level since last June, with pessimism about the future returning. The Conference Board's index is now near depressed levels of 2022, when inflation was raging.
The disconnect between Trump's economic rhetoric and the data suggests that Americans are not buying into his narrative, which could be a sign of a broader trend towards skepticism towards untested economic ideologies.
As Trump takes office, will the erosion of confidence in the economy lead to a rise in populist sentiment, or can he still convince voters that his unique blend of protectionism and deregulation will yield positive results?
The prospect of "American exceptionalism" has been dealt a significant blow as the US stock market lags behind other developed economies, with the S&P 500 dropping over 3% since Trump took office. The economic data suggests that US businesses are struggling under Trump's trade war and other policies, with retail spending falling sharply, hiring slowing down, and consumer confidence plummeting. The investor outlook has become increasingly cautious, with some forecasts predicting a decline in economic growth.
The rapid collapse of the "American exceptionalism" trade serves as a stark reminder that market sentiment can quickly turn against even the most seemingly robust fundamentals, highlighting the importance of remaining vigilant in investment decisions.
What are the implications for investors who had bet big on Trump's policies and how will they navigate this shift in market sentiment?
Wall Street is increasingly skeptical about the existence of a "Trump put" as the S&P 500 faces significant declines, erasing gains made since the election. Analysts note that President Trump's reduced focus on the stock market during his second term, coupled with his recent tariff decisions, suggests that he may not intervene to support falling stock prices as he had previously. The uncertainty surrounding Trump's approach to economic policy is leading investors to reassess their strategies in light of the current market volatility.
The evolving relationship between presidential policy and stock market performance highlights the complexities of investor psychology and economic forecasting in times of political change.
What factors could lead to a shift in Trump's approach to the stock market, and how might that influence investor confidence moving forward?
Cryptocurrency prices have continued their downward trend due to escalating tariff war tensions and diminishing prospects of further Federal Reserve rate cuts, outweighing the pro-crypto announcements from President Donald Trump last week. The uncertainty surrounding these economic factors has led to a decrease in investor confidence, with Bitcoin falling as much as 3.7% early on Monday. Despite recent developments that have given investors a more bullish outlook, macroeconomic headwinds are still dominating the crypto market.
The increasing correlation between cryptocurrency prices and traditional financial markets suggests that the current slump may be a broader reflection of economic conditions rather than solely a result of regulatory or political factors.
Can policymakers effectively address the concerns of small-scale investors who are increasingly seeking alternative assets to diversify their portfolios, and if so, how would this impact the overall trajectory of the cryptocurrency market?
Any rebound in the S&P 500 Index is likely to prove temporary amid concerns about the US economy, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. strategists. The market has faltered this year on worries about lofty valuations for the technology behemoths. Investors have also questioned if President Donald Trump's America-First policies are likely to stoke inflation and lead to a slowing economy.
This outlook suggests that the ongoing debate over the impact of inflationary policies on economic growth may be more nuanced than previously thought, with implications for investors seeking stable returns.
How will policymakers' efforts to balance inflation concerns with economic stimulus packages shape the trajectory of US stock markets in 2025?
The US labor market added 151,000 jobs in February, just below expectations, while the unemployment rate inched up to 4.1%. Economists largely read the report as better-than-feared, given other signs of economic growth slowing. However, the looming question for markets remains when the Federal Reserve will actually cut rates again.
The uncertainty surrounding future Fed actions could have a ripple effect on investor sentiment and market volatility, potentially influencing the trajectory of the US economy.
Will the inflation data reveal a sharp acceleration in price increases due to President Trump's tariffs, sending shockwaves through the global economy?
American voters are expressing frustration with both U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky following a contentious meeting at the White House that showcased significant diplomatic tensions. The incident revealed deep divisions in American public opinion regarding support for Ukraine, as some voters feel that Zelensky's approach was inappropriate while others condemned Trump's demeanor as callous and disrespectful. This fallout highlights the complexity of international relations and the varying expectations Americans hold for their leaders in times of conflict.
The contrasting reactions from voters underscore the challenge of balancing national interests with moral responsibilities in foreign diplomacy, particularly when leaders' approaches clash dramatically.
How might this incident influence future U.S. foreign policy decisions regarding Ukraine and relations with other nations facing similar conflicts?
US consumer prices probably rose in February at a pace that illustrates plodding progress on inflation, with annual price growth elevated and lingering cost pressures expected to continue. The magnitude of the increase leaves room for concern among Federal Reserve officials, who have an inflation goal of 2% and are keenly monitoring policy developments from the Trump administration. However, moderate economic growth and steady payrolls growth tempered by hints of underlying cracks in the labor market are also contributing to a more nuanced view on inflation.
The persistence of sticky inflation may necessitate a reevaluation of monetary policy frameworks that prioritize wage growth over price stability, particularly if supply chains remain vulnerable to global risks.
How will the evolving dynamics between inflation expectations and actual price growth influence policymakers' decisions at the Federal Reserve's March 18-19 policy meeting?
The recent steep decline in Wall Street futures has raised concerns among investors about the potential impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariffs on the economy. The 91% of economists who view a downturn as likely under Trump's rapidly shifting trade policies are largely correct, given the uncertainty and volatility surrounding his trade actions. As markets struggle to come to terms with the implications of these tariffs, investors are increasingly looking for signs of weakness in major economies.
The escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and its trading partners may ultimately prove to be a self-inflicted wound, undermining global economic growth and fuelling protectionism.
Will the European Central Bank's decision on interest rates this week provide enough support for the struggling eurozone economy, or will it simply serve as a temporary Band-Aid?
Treasuries rallied as President Donald Trump's comments on "a period of transition" for the US economy added to concern that a slowdown could be just around the corner. Benchmark 10-year yields slipped as much as 6 basis points after his remarks Sunday, which followed a volatile week for markets as investors fretted about the impact of tariffs and federal job cuts on growth. Those bonds now yield 4.25%, while the two-year security β which is most sensitive to the outlook for interest rates β pay 3.95%.
The market's reaction to Trump's comments highlights the ongoing uncertainty surrounding his economic policies, which could continue to weigh on investor confidence and influence monetary policy.
Will the recent Treasury yield declines be enough to stem a potential recession, or do they merely signal a temporary reprieve for the US economy?
US stocks tanked to session lows on Thursday after more tariff whiplash from the Trump administration, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 1%, or over 400 points, while the S&P 500 dropped nearly 2%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite plummeted more than 2.6% and has now entered correction territory, down more than 10% from its December record high. Trade-war uncertainty has persisted as investors weighed how far President Donald Trump would be willing to negotiate on tariffs.
This episode highlights the precarious relationship between investor sentiment and market volatility in the era of populist policies, where unexpected shifts can trigger massive sell-offs.
Will this correction mark a turning point for the markets, or will it continue to ebb and flow in response to Trump's trade agenda?
Donald Trump has stood behind his ambitious tariff plans, defended the implementation of new tariffs on America's top three trading partners, and acknowledged potential economic discomfort as a necessary step to achieve his goals. The president's address to Congress was marked by culture war standoffs and an effort to reassure investors despite two days of stock market losses. However, the speech did little to calm uneasy markets this week.
The president's repeated warnings about "a little disturbance" in the markets may be seen as a veiled threat, potentially undermining investor confidence and further exacerbating market volatility.
How will the ongoing economic uncertainty and market fluctuations impact the long-term prospects of President Trump's agenda and his ability to achieve his policy goals?
US stock futures held steady as Wall Street prepared for President Donald Trump's broad tariffs on America's top trading partners to take effect. Futures attached to the S&P 500 climbed 0.2%, Nasdaq futures rose 0.3%, and Dow Jones futures pushed up 0.1% from the flatline. The countries had been negotiating with the Trump administration to avoid the tariffs, but Trump said there is "no room left" for Canada or Mexico to strike a deal.
This move signals a growing trend in global trade tensions, potentially leading to retaliatory measures and market volatility.
How will the imposition of these tariffs impact the global economy's growth trajectory and the long-term competitiveness of US industries?
Markets are recalibrating their expectations regarding Donald Trump's economic policies, anticipating a slowdown in growth as he implements significant tariffs on imports from major trading partners. The response from investors has shifted from optimism about rising yields and a strong dollar to a more cautious outlook, with many fleeing to defensive sectors as volatility increases. The evolving trade landscape has left investors grappling with uncertainty, as the potential for retaliatory measures and further tariffs complicates market dynamics.
This situation illustrates the complexity of global trade and the ripple effects that national policies can have on international markets, prompting a reevaluation of risk strategies by investors.
How might ongoing trade tensions under Trump's administration reshape the landscape for global economic partnerships in the coming years?
U.S. stock index futures fell on Monday as worries persisted that the Trump administration's tariff policies could affect the world's largest economy, while EV maker Tesla declined following a bearish brokerage forecast. The benchmark S&P 500 logged its biggest weekly drop since September on Friday and the tech-heavy Nasdaq fell more than 10% from its December record high on Thursday. Investors will be watching closely for data on inflation, job openings and consumer confidence later in the week.
As trade tensions escalate, global investors are facing a stark reality: they can't predict what Trump's next move will be, leaving them to navigate treacherous waters with little direction.
Will the market's response to these uncertainty-driven moves ultimately prove to be a catalyst for growth, or simply a precursor to more volatility?
Zelenskyy challenged the idea that Ukraine can rely on diplomatic guarantees by Russia, whose leader Vladimir Putin launched the war in 2022. U.S. President Donald Trump found the tone and body language of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenksyy objectionable during an Oval Office meeting that exploded into a loud argument on Friday. The White House said there was not a specific thing that Zelenskyy said in the Oval Office to Trump or Vice President JD Vance that the president objected to, but the tone and manner in which he said it.
The use of body language as a tool for conveyance can be particularly revealing when it comes from the leader of an embattled nation such as Ukraine, where diplomatic tensions with Russia are fraught with high stakes.
How will the U.S. perception of Zelenskyy's leadership style influence its assessment of his ability to navigate the complex web of international diplomacy surrounding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine?
Major U.S. stock indexes declined sharply due to investor concerns about President Donald Trump's trade policy impact on companies and the broader economy, while Marvell Technology's revenue forecast sparked worries about spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure. The S&P 500 dipped below its 200-day moving average for the first time since November 1, 2023, as investors struggled to gauge the stability of the market. The sell-off was exacerbated by Trump's confusing and aggressive trade stance, which has fueled fears among investors.
Investors' anxiety about the uncertainty surrounding Trump's tariffs may be reflective of a broader concern about the unpredictability of global economic trends, with far-reaching implications for corporate strategies and investment decisions.
How will the ongoing market volatility influence policymakers' decisions on tax reform and regulatory policies in the wake of the election?
The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model has signaled a concerning -2.8% growth estimate for the current quarter, a stark decline from previous projections and the fastest contraction since the pandemic lockdown. This drop is attributed to a combination of a record-high trade deficit and weakening manufacturing activity, reflecting broader economic uncertainties tied to President Trump's policies. As consumer sentiment falters and market indicators flash warning signs, the potential for a "Trumpcession" looms, raising questions about the Federal Reserve's next steps.
This unexpected economic downturn highlights the fragility of recovery in the face of political and trade-related uncertainties, suggesting that policy decisions carry significant weight in shaping real economic outcomes.
In what ways might the evolving economic landscape influence voter sentiment and policy priorities leading up to the next election cycle?
Hundreds of people gathered in US cities to express their support for Ukraine after a heated exchange between Donald Trump and Volodymr Zelensky at the White House, with protesters holding signs that referenced the row and Russia's war with Ukraine. The incident has sparked widespread condemnation, with many viewing it as a display of Trump's lack of respect for Ukrainian leaders. Pro-Ukraine protests have taken place across the US, with demonstrators calling on Trump to take a stronger stance against Russian aggression.
The contrast between Trump's aggressive rhetoric towards Zelensky and the widespread support for Ukraine from US protesters highlights the growing divide between the two countries' leaderships on foreign policy.
How will this incident impact the diplomatic relationship between the US and Ukraine in the long term, particularly given Trump's ongoing role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency?